This mode of writing gives the basic structure of such a mapping but tells nothing about the details how such a function works. To transform such an abstract connection into a concrete working function one has therefore to make additional assumptions, e.g.:
| (3.3) | |||
| (3.4) | |||
| (3.5) | |||
| (3.6) | |||
| (3.7) | |||
| (3.8) | |||
| (3.9) |
This can again be represented in a diagram by opening the box of the dependency
as abstract function and filling the content of the f1-box up with already known functions like
and
. Doing this we give the abstract function
an operational meaning (cf. figure 3.5).
Gerd Doeben-Henisch 2009-12-09